Are Emotions Ethically Significant? :: Philosophy Philosophical Papers

Are Emotions Ethically Significant? Introduction The ethical significance of the emotions is a potentially enormous and difficult topic. Some of the positions that can be maintained include: 1 No moral judgements (either positive or negative) can legitimately be made of emotions. 2 Emotions are subject to moral praise or blame in just the same way (or, analogous to the way) that acts are. 3 Emotions are subject to moral praise or blame, but in a very different way from acts. 4 Emotions are the primary carriers of value, while rationality is purely instrumental ('reason is a value-neutral technique'); therefore moral judgement should properly concern itself only with the emotions, their origins and effects. The issue The issue is ambiguously, and hence interestingly, stated by Brecht in Der Dreigroschenoper. Polly Peachum, who is trying unsuccessfully to resist the emotional and sensual spell of Macheath, sings the soulful "Barbara-Song", including in the first stanza the line "Ja, da muss man kalt und herzlos sein." [Indeed, one must be cold and heartless] (Note "man"; Polly here is trying to state a general truth, not (yet) directly applying it to herself.) Since we (and Macheath) know that he cares little about Polly in the way she would like to be cared for, can we say that Macheath's emotional attentions to her are unethical? Or not? On what basis? Two arguments that there is no ethical significance to the emotions Before proceeding to the analysis, we must consider two possible arguments against the thesis that emotional states are subject to any moral praise or blame at all. If they are not, then that is the end of the discussion, or rather, it is the beginning of a different discussion. I believe these arguments fail, but the reasons why each fails point the way to understanding why and in what way the emotions do have ethical significance. First argument The first argument is this: (a) An act (including failure to act) can be subject to moral praise or blame only to the extent that it directly or indirectly affects (harms or benefits) the agent himself, or a moral patient (up to and including Nature as a whole), or if the agent could reasonably (as a moral agent) have anticipated this effect. (b) However, by this definition the ethical significance of the act lies only in its actual or possible consequences, and in the intentions and beliefs held by or ascribed to the agent concerning them.

Capitalism According to Karl Marx

Capitalism Harmonizing to Karl Marx InThe Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx evaluates the effects of capitalist economy on society and asserts that it has both positive and negative constituents. Marx states that capitalist economy ends feudal system, establishes the universe market, develops a more efficient commercialism, agglomerates population, and increases the technological procedure every bit good as communicating on land. However, Marx is extremely critical of capitalist economy. He notes the steep category division between the opinion middle class and the tuging proletarian categories and acknowledges this as a cardinal defect in the party. He views the category division as a merchandise of historical forms. Marx disagrees with the Southern Cross of capitalist society and its strong accent on pecuniary dealingss. He believes the subjugation of the workers will imminently spur the overthrow of the middle class. Marx makes a persuasive and perceptive statement analysing the advantages and disadvantages of capitalis t economy, while foretelling its eventual death. Marx underscores this theory by prefering socialism as a gradual replacing for capitalist economy, which would so germinate into to entire Communism. Feudalism, from Marx’s position, was an inefficient economic system that â€Å"no longer sufficed for the turning wants of the new markets† ( 10 ) . Marx credits capitalist economy with the terminal of feudal system. The feudal system was no longer compatible with the turning productive forces ; feudal system was curtailing the really productiveness and exchange of the fabrication industry. As demand for new merchandises continued to lift, universe markets continued spread outing. The consequence was the fabrication system, which had later turned into the â€Å"giant, modern industry† ( 11 ) . Through industry, there was an instant betterment in production. The addition in the velocity and efficiency of production helped come on the invention of new engineering. In add-on to stoping feudal system and holding created a more efficient economic system, Marx sees capitalist economy as going a revolution. Marx takes note that the productivity of the spread outing universe markets was the fastest of all time witnessed earlier. â€Å"The middle class during its regulation of scarce one hundred old ages, has created more monolithic and more prodigious productive forces so have all preceding coevalss together† ( 14 ) . Capitalism’s enlargement led to the formation of a well-developed commercialism, pilotage, and land communicating. As a consequence of those accomplishments, there was a growing in urbanisation, increased capital, and the changeless betterment of industry ( 11 ) . The middle class has subjected the state to the regulation of the towns. It has created tremendous metropoliss, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural, and has therefore rescued a considerable portion of the population from the idi ocyofrural life† ( 14 ) . Marx argues that the specifically capitalist system of production and itsurban systems incorporate people and compelled them to interact in a mode that was unprecedented in rural countries. Later, Marx will see this efficient economic revolution as the stepping-stone towards Communism. Capitalism contributed vastly towards the development of the modern province. Although the replacing of Feudalism did present an improved economic system, Marx disputes that it did non include the devastation of its category hostility. The two categories within society were resolutely split and developed into two obviously contrasting categories. A hierarchy was formed with the middle class on top as the opinion category and the laboring workers on underside. There were no societal differentiations between the two categories besides their differing functions in capitalist community. From the outgrowth of this new industry came its leaders, the modern middle class, and the workers, the modern labour category, â€Å"who live merely so long as they find work, and who find work merely so long as their labour additions capital† ( 16 ) . Marx characterizes the mercenary middle class as opinion over the workers thanks to the go oning addition of capital and private belongings. The workers were a agency of production, no longer necessitating any specialised acc omplishments like before capitalist economy ; they were an â€Å"appendage† of the machine ( 16 ) . â€Å"The middle class has stripped of its aura every business hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe† ( 12 ) . Occupations that were one time considered to be skilled labour were losing their prestigiousness as their specific accomplishments were rendered worthless under new methods of production ( 17 ) . The middle class attempted to deskill their places and therefore rid society of a in-between category. By deskilling doctors, attorneies, and priests, the middle class could force these workers into the labor category where they could work and suppress them with much greater easiness. The lower strata of the in-between category began to drop into the workers as good. Nonetheless, an spread outing labor category was deriving in both Numberss and in strength thanks to the steps which unified workers under capitalist production. Marx criticizes capitalist economies ageless demand for the revolutionizing of production and the instability that this causes. The â€Å"everlasting uncertainness and agitation distinguish the middle class era from all earlier ones† ( 13 ) . He sees this as contradictory and irrational because it is non executable to anticipate lasting uninterrupted growing and enlargement for economic success. The demand to constantly spread out one’s market drives the middle class to work markets all over the universe. â€Å"All that is solid thaws into air† ( 13 ) . Metaphorically talking, Marxhighlights the instabilities within capitalist economy. He underscores that the ceaseless demand for growing leaves capitalist economy without a â€Å"solid† foundation. The middle class, as Marx puts it, â€Å"played a most radical role† ( 12 ) . The middle class may hold ended the feudal ties that bounded people to their â€Å"natural higher-ups, † nevertheless ; they established the workman as merely a â€Å"paid wage-laborer, † without any personal worth ( 12 ) . Marx believes that the middle class have belittled the working-class adult male, the worker, into nil more than a trade good. He goes on to state â€Å"a category of labourers, who live merely so long as they find work, and who find work merely so long as their labour additions capital† ( 16 ) . Marx claims the workers have no single character and go obviously a beginning of capital for the middle class. The laden workers would finally get the better of this by subverting the middle class. Marx believes capitalist economy will, at one point, no longer be compatible to run society. The workers do non come on with the increasing industry ; They â€Å" [ sank ] deeper and deeper below the conditions of being of [ their ] ain class† ( 22 ) . The middle class relied on capital. Capital is merely produced every bit long as the wage-laborers are portion of production. However, in capitalist economy, competition with engineering unfolded and threatened the wage-laborers’ topographic point in production. The proletarians’ topographic point in production regressed and became threatened of bing. Marx states that the middle class are no longer suit to be the â€Å"ruling category in society, † because of this. The workers, who have no ownership of belongings or power over productive forces, were the bulk of society ; hence, their battles should be the battles of the state ( 21 ) . Marx theorizes that the workers would subvert the middle class hierarchy fueled by their ain category battle. The middle class in respects to capitalist economy, in Marx’s position, was â€Å"like the magician who is no longer able to command the powers of the nether universe whom he has called up by his spells† ( 15 ) . The middle class developed excessively much power over the on the job category and enslaved them â€Å"by the machine, † with changeless labour ( 17 ) . Marx stated that the middle class oppressed the workers to the point of revolution and overthrow. What makes the workers capable of subverting the dominant middle class was that they had increased in figure and strength, holding become more greatly concentrated in the multitudes ( 18 ) . Ironically, the enlargement of capitalist economy under the middle class is what assisted the workers in doing the overthrow possible. The workers were better able to pass on with one another through the improved engineering. Furthermore, the workers could form themselves into labour brotherhoods that could order statute law to be passed in acknowledgment of worker’s involvements. Marx establishes the fact that the middle class become so consumed by their power from capitalist economy, that they lose sight of how laden the workers become. In response to the failures of the middle class towards intervention of the workers, and the proletarian’s rise to laterality, Marx presents Communism. The Communist party sought the overthrow of middle class domination and the rise of power from the workers ( 23 ) . The Communists represented the involvements of all workers, and do non organize opposing propertyless parties. How the Communists achieved this, Marx inside informations, is that they abolish private belongings. By acquiring rid of private belongings, the anchor of capitalist economy, the middle class lose their societal power and go at equal footings with the workers. They converted private belongings to ‘common property’ so that they could acquire rid of category character, which separated the workers from the middle class. The Communists besides sought the elimination of the proletarians’ lowly map in capitalist economy, to increase the bourgeoisie’s capital ( 25 ) . Alternatively, the Communists wanted to â€Å"centralize all instruments of production in the custodies of the state† so that there would non be power in the custodies o f the few ( 31 ) . The overall end of the Communists could be seen as no longer holding the category hostility as were in capitalist economy, and holding the whole state be in control of the production so that there was no laden category. Although Marx sees capitalist economy as holding positive benefits in society, he does non believe it was the right way for society to follow. Capitalism made headroom towards a genuinely revolutionized modern province. It increased productiveness among universe markets, introduced new engineering and communications, and achieved industrialism. However, category hostilities were non eliminated, and alternatively became more profoundly embedded. The middle class and workers had turned into two viing categories through capitalist economy. Materialism was more extremely regarded than individuality, holding led to the workers suffered. Marx sees capitalist economy as the measure towards accomplishing pure Communism. Communism would acquire rid of the societal hierarchy founded in the capitalist system, holding made the workers equal. In decision, Marx’s persuasive and perceptive essay efficaciously answers why capitalist economy overall does non function good for the working-class , and was instead a needful revolution for the measure towards Communism.

The Role Of The Chorus And Its Impact On The Audience

THE ROLE OF THE CHORUS AND ITS IMPACT ON THE AUDIENCE IN OEDIPUS THE KING Angad Dev Singh History of Drama and Theater I Optional Research Paper Tenth of December 2014 The chorus is an essential feature of Greek classical drama. Instances of various types of dance, singing, and speech are some elements of a Greek chorus. â€Å"Composed of similarly costumed men, they performed on the orchestra located beneath the stage. The chorus stayed in the orchestra for the duration of the performance from which vantage point they observed and commented on the action of the characters.† Oedipus is a play written by Sophocles, a respected playwright, and it is â€Å"generally assumed that the main function of the Sophoclean chorus is a philosophical one; that it serves above all as the spokesman for a certain view of life.† The chorus can be dramatic in the following ways: â€Å"through the personality of the group forming the chorus and the appropriateness of their relationship to the action and the characters, through the iambic lines spoken by the coryphaeus, through physical participation in the action and through the choral songs.† The chorus is an important component of the Greek Tragedy Oedipus. Aside from its responsibility to effectively represent the people of Thebes, the chorus in Oedipus has a powerful influence over audience perceptions and emotions. Oedipus is a play centered around the mythical Greek King of Thebes and hisShow MoreRelatedRole Of The Chorus : Viewer Or Participant?1567 Words   |  7 PagesThe Role of the Chorus: Viewer or Participant? Throughout the canon of Greek Tragedy, playwrights have told many stories with a wide range of characters. Tales of revenge, redemption, lust, greed, and pride, as told by gods, kings, heroes, and murderers among many others. Throughout all of these works, one aspect remains consistent: that of the chorus. This group, which interjects periodically throughout the play to sing in unison, is a feature common to all Greek tragedies. That being said, whenRead MoreThe Chorus as a Homonym 1168 Words   |  5 PagesEuripides’s Medea the Chorus is both a tool for characterization and representation of theme; however, the ways they function in their respective plays are noticeably different. The differences in the way the Choruses function in each respective play make the name of the character â€Å"the Chorus† a homonym, same name different meaning. The Chorus in Antigone functions to incorporate the technique of metatheatre. The purpose of metatheatre is to provide a separation between the audience and the actors inRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Sophocles Oedipus The King )1044 Words   |  5 PagesThe Forgotten Ones (Describe the Significance of the Chorus in Sophocles’ Oedipus the King) Oedipus the King is a famous play written by the renowned author Sophocles and first acted out back in 429 BC. It is the second of three plays written by Sophocles that dealt with Oedipus; the first one being Oedipus at Colonus and the last one being Antigone. This play relates the story of Oedipus, a man who becomes King of Thebes while unwittingly fulfilling an old prophecy that said that he would killRead MoreEssay on The Flawed King in Shakespeares Henry V1572 Words   |  7 Pagessubtly to his audience. No matter in which camp one rests, Henry V holds relevance for the modern stage. Despite containing contradictions, Henry is also a symbol as he is one person. This unity of person brings about the victory in the battle of Agincourt. The theme of unity transcends any ambiguity found in Henrys character or motives. This theme is evident in many areas of Henry V, but for the sake of this article, the importance of this theme is discussed between play and audience, and withinRead MoreOedipus The King : A Tragic Hero870 Words   |  4 Pagesthe abuse of power, and a tense relationship between man and God. It also meets the five main standards for a tragedy: a tragic hero of noble birth, a tragic flaw, a fall from grace, a moment of remorse, and catharsis [HubPages]. In this play, the audience learns of Oedipus’ past and hears foreshadowing of his future all while we see him trying to figure it out for himself. He suffers from hubris, or extreme pride, which blinds him from truly seeing his doom. . Simply, this tragedy illustrates theRead MoreOedipus Rex1350 Words   |  6 Pagesby recognition, or by both. Aristotle also points out terms such as catharsis, which can be said that is the purification of oneâ €™s soul. He argues in his Poetics that catharsis is achieved through emotions of pity or fear, which is created in the audience as they witness the tragedy of a character who suffers unjustly, but is not entirely innocent. Recognition is a change from ignorance to knowledge leading either to friendship or hostility depending on whether the character is marked with good fortuneRead More The Function of the Chorus in Henry V Essay1663 Words   |  7 PagesThe Function of the Chorus in Henry V O for a muse of fire, The Chorus introduces the start of Henry V with imagery of flames and war. Shakespeare uses the Chorus to initiate the play and summarise each act to the audience before the next one begins. He is merely a tool to avoid the audience getting too confused. The function for the chorus is merely a practical one, by summarising the plot at every available opportunity; there is little chance for confusion, evenRead MoreThe Ancient Greek Of Ancient Greece1690 Words   |  7 Pagespolitical power. The voice of the actor was greatly amplified by the shape of the masks. The audiences were able to hear the actors when they were in masks. Moreover, the types of clothing in both The Bacchae and The Antigone were a representation of the Greek culture. Stage in most ancient Greek plays was composed of four main areas. The first was around place in which plays and acts were done. The audience sat on the ‘theatron’, then there was the building behind the ‘state’ which was decoratedRead MoreThe Impact Of Ancient Greek Theater And Tragedy1703 Words   |  7 PagesMichimasa Kamata HUM 101-007 3/17/16 The Impact of Ancient Greek Theater and Tragedy Ancient Greek culture has influenced our modern culture in many ways from philosophy to medicine to government. We still use many of their concepts, technology, and even alphabet system. Without ancient Greece, our modern world would not have advanced as far. A significant contribution of the ancient Greek culture to the world today is the Greek theater, more specifically the structure of tragedy. Some contributionsRead MoreAncient Greek Theatre and Drama1648 Words   |  7 Pageswe look at theatre presently, and will forever be the reason the world loves theatre as much as it does today. Ancient Greek theatre is significant to theatre history due to the Great Dionysia, the actors, genres, and playwrights, and continues to impact modern theatre today. First, the Great Dionysia, also called City Dionysia, is where tragedy and comedy originated. It was a Greek festival celebrated in honor of the god of wine and fertility, Dionysus. These popular festivals were attended by all